money talks

Gareth Morgan has made some extreme comments in relation to changes in the Maungatautari Ecological Island Trust's governance. He isn't happy about the number of mana whenua representatives - not happy at all and in his usual style has shot from the hip. He has been accused of racism - what do you think?

Nikki Preston, Waikato Times

Economist Gareth Morgan said successful iwi attempts to take greater control of the project were "a case of blatant self-serving opportunism".

The hard work of volunteers, private funders and landowners was being "threatened by piracy," he said. He is calling for the flagship 3400 hectare ecological island to be given national park status to protect it from political gamesmanship.

Multimillionaire Dr Morgan said iwi were "seizing and capitalising" on the community's, landowners' and private funders' efforts.

"My concern is their contribution to work and funding has been zilch.

"If they had been at all honest they would have made this move before, not after, the fence was erected." He said few, if any, private funders "will be willing to pour money down the throats of the wide-mouth frogs of indigenous imperialism".

Mana whenua had "struggled to lift a finger so far" and now the hard work was done and money contributed, they were demanding effective control of the mountain's future, Mr Morgan said.

What a diatribe, but is it true? Not according to those who might know something about it.

Dr Morgan's claims have been slammed by trust chairman Doug Arcus, iwi and the Waipa District Council.

They said Dr Morgan was "ill-informed" and funders they had spoken to were supportive of the new governance structure.

Mr Arcus, a Hamilton lawyer, said Dr Morgan's comments were "misinformed, simplistic and what many on the trust considered racist". His comments overlooked key facts, including Maori owning the largest amount of land locked up behind the fence, and that iwi were legally required to be involved in relocation of species.

Waipa Mayor Alan Livingston – also a trustee – said Dr Morgan's comments were "out of whack". He said the new governance structure would be more effective when it came to making quick decisions.

And what is the big change that has caused this distress?

Under the new structure, mana whenua will provide three of the six trustees, with the remainder drawn from landowners and community representatives and the board having the option to co-opt another two trustees. Iwi will be able to appoint a co-chair.

It is still only 3 of the 6 trustees - that is not onerous considering the stake tangata whenua have in the area. And also considering the state of the trust as i posted about here. What is this project?

The trust oversees the ambitious ecological project which saw a 47km-long pest-proof fence built around the bush-clad mountain southeast of Cambridge. Since the fence was completed in 2005 and pests eradicated, more than 30 kiwi and other endangered wildlife – including takahe – have been released on to the mountain.

In October, Ngati Koroki Kahukura chair Karaitiana Tamatea told the Waikato Times iwi were hopefully of a cash settlement for their Waitangi Tribunal claim in relation to Maungatautari, which would be invested and the interest ploughed into the project. Iwi were aiming to be able to provide "about $1m a year, forever," he said.

Morgan gave a 1 million interest free loan and was going to write it off but because of the increase in Maori involvement on the board now isn't. If morgan is really interested in helping this trust then he will listen to the people involved and what they consider the best way forward is - there is no ownership involved in giving a interest-free loan - that's just business.

Listen to iwi - really listen.

This story is a bit of a worry.

"Iwi representatives on the troubled Maungatautari Ecological Island Trust have quit in protest over a shakeup of the project's management.

Three iwi representatives have resigned following the layoffs of four salaried administrative staff, including chief executive Jim Mylchreest.

They are also concerned about the trust's direction, particularly a proposed tourism development, and plans to charge visitors."

What is the problem?

"A spokesperson for Ngati Koroki Kahukura, Tao tao Tauroa, said the representatives had no choice in offering their resignations because they had been put in a "vulnerable situation".

Mr Tauroa said other iwi had trusted them to look after some of the most precious native wildlife New Zealand had to offer and they had to show that they were up to the task.

"We were particularly concerned at the newly proposed strategic direction and the lack of time given to consider the proposal, which includes a tourism development and the introduction of a charging regime. Manu whenua feel these require wider debate and consideration.
Up until October the administration staff had been responsible for filing reports that met their requirements under a memorandum of understanding with other iwi.
"Maungatautari is a phenomenal conservation restoration project which has captured the imagination and support of the community. Manu whenua believe it is essential for the community to have the required say in the project's future. He said that before the meeting representatives were concerned they hadn't been given enough time to talk with constituents about the decision to axe the four administrative staff."

This is what consultation is all about. It is about discussing and mulling and considering and contemplating. Trying to ram things through too fast is as bad as doing nothing.

Listen to tangata whenua - they are on your side.

 

"Mr Tauroa was pleasantly surprised by the subsequent commitment to consult with Maori."

It (the resignations) has worked because there are no two ways about it – they have to talk to us about it. They don't have a trust without iwi," said Mr Tauroa."

Listen to tangata whenua - really listen.